Отправить эту статью по почте 
On the ambiguity of descriptions: A defence of the world-pronoun theory
Аннотация
On the ambiguity of descriptions: A defence of the world-pronoun theory
Полный текст:
PDFЛитература
A. Brasoveanu and D. Farkas. How indefinites choose their scope // Linguistics and Philosophy 34.1 (2011), pp. 1–55.
K. von Fintel and I. Heim. Intensional Semantics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2011. URL: http://web.mit.edu/fintel/fintel-heim-intensional.pdf.
L. Karttunen. Pronouns and variables // Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 5, 1969, pp. 108–116.
E. Keshet. Sloppy identity unbound // Proceedings of SALT, vol. 23, 2013, pp. 412–431.
P. Koralus. Descriptions, ambiguity, and representationalist theories of interpretation // Philosophical studies, 162.2 (2013), pp. 275–290.
T. Parsons. Articulating Medieval Logic. Oxford University Press, 2014.
B. H. Partee. Opacity, coreference, and pronouns // Synthese 21.3–4 (1970), pp. 359–385.
O. Percus. Constraints on some other variables in syntax // Natural Language Semantics 8.3 (2000), pp. 173–229.
O. Percus. Res-Marking in Belief Reports. Edited transcript of a talk given at the Workshop on Attitudinal Semantics. 2013. URL: www.academia.edu/4735248/Res- marking_in_Belief_Reports_Edited_transcript_of_talk_2013_.
M. Rebuschi and T. Tulenheimo. Between de dicto and de re: de objecto attitudes // Philosophical Quarterly 61.245 (2011), pp. 828–838.
F. Schwarz. Situation pronouns in determiner phrases // Natural Language Semantics 20.4 (2012), pp. 431–475.
W. Sternefeld. Wide Scope in situ // Language and Logos, ed. by T. Hanneforth and G. Fanselow. Berlin, 2010.
A. M. Zwicky and J. M. Sadock. Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them // Syntax and Semantics, ed. by J. P. Kimball, vol. 4, 1975, pp. 1–36.
Ссылки
- На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.
(c) 2016 Daniel Tiskin
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.