Twardowskian Semantics for Performative Utterances

M. A. Smirnov

Аннотация


Works of Twardowski in the early 20th century contain an outline of a general semantic framework for natural languages. This framework, proposed within Twardowski’s theory of actions and ‘products,’ provides a drastic alternative to Frege’s semantic framework based on the notion of proposition (Gedanke in Frege). The latter has to a great extent shaped the following development of logical semantics. However, some recent works state that Twardowski’s theory allows to dissolve a number of problems characteristic of proposition-based semantics. In this paper, I show that it also provides a ground for a certain reconsideration of speech act theory. Since speech act theory was suggested by Austin as a fundamental alternative to standard proposition-oriented view on language, its emergence in a sense has divided philosophy of language into barely connected realms. The turn to Twardowskian semantics arguably allows to develop a more consistent understanding of how language works.

Полный текст:

PDF

Литература


Frege G. Der Gedanke. Eine logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1.3–4, 1918–1919, S. 58–77.

Twardowski K. O czynnościach i wytworach: kilka uwag z pogranicza psychologii, gramatyki i logiki. Kraków, 1911.

Moltmann F. Attitudinal objects and propositions. Routledge Handbook of Propositions / ed. by A. Murray, C. Tillman. Routledge, 2023.

Soames S. What is meaning? Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2010.

Hanks P. Propositional content. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Austin J. Philosophical papers / ed. by J. Urmson, G. Warnock. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.

Corredor C. The reflexivity of explicit performatives. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, Segunda Epoca, 24.3(66), 2009, p. 283–299.

Ginet C. Performativity. Linguistics and Philosophy 3.2, 1979, p. 245–265.

Searle J. How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12.5, 1989, p. 535–558.

Bach K., Harnish R. How performatives really work: A reply to Searle. Linguistics and Philosophy 15.1, 1992, p. 93–110.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52119/LPHS.2024.69.77.011

Ссылки

  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.




(c) 2024 M. A. Smirnov

Лицензия Creative Commons
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.